The problem we are solving

Health care still runs on stale rosters, unscanned PDFs, and disconnected systems that cannot answer—at scale—who said this was true, when, and is it still true? Past national provider directory attempts never fixed that; they left the same operating model in place. The gap shows up as wrong network directories, slow credentialing, and privacy failures when sensitive columns move through unmanaged extracts nobody can defend. When the roster is wrong, the patient hits the wrong network—and the org owns the harm. This is not a phone-book problem; it is a lineage and control problem—and it still drives denials, stalled onboarding, and PHI risk.

Fragmentation

Plan directories, hospital privilege files, CMS-facing attestations, and partner APIs often describe the same practitioner with different shapes and clocks—without a single reconciliation story.

Weak lineage

Issuance and operational signals (verification status, integrity alerts, attestations) rarely travel together—reviewers cannot tie cryptographic proof to day-to-day stewardship queues.

Interchange drag

Without an honest FHIR-shaped path to refresh directories, every buyer reinvents CSV dialects—while compliance still expects traceable, policy-bound payloads.

Our approach

NVPDR centers a golden registry record with explicit verification events, optional verifiable credential issuance metadata for high-risk attestations, and Integrity-style analytics layered on the same NPI keys your stewards already work in UI. Downstream, we surface Plan–Net style FHIR bundles as the interchange metaphor—not a certified endpoint claim in the demo, but a credible sketch buyers recognize.

Registry-first VC-ready lineage Integrity & attest paths FHIR roster interchange Persona-scoped UX

Interactive demo — guided flow

The live demonstration walks stakeholders through realistic personas in order—eight lenses on the same synthetic roster—so you can show interchange and governance in one sitting.

3 Hospital / Medical Staff

Review incoming privilege packets and approve or deny.

4 Health Plan Administrator

FHIR carries submit/download interchange; Integrity-style analytics carry verification posture & composite scores—use either or both in the same demo path.

5 Partner (API consumer)

Preview the same roster payload shape an exchange or partner system would pull.

6 Patient

Each patient persona opens a plan-scoped health-plan provider directory (in-network slice). Use keywords or specialty filters, then open a profile for verification and enrollment context.

7 Platform operations

Inspect where the DDL lives and review the demo audit log.

8 VA Community Care

Submit Community Care information to CMS, then download—via FHIR—the providers you want to add to your Community Care provider directory.

Try the full UI — synthetic data, in-browser only; not affiliated with CMS.

Open interactive demo →